Now more than ever before Seattle residents are reliant on their network for their vital business activities, e.g. transaction with allies, sales, billing, inventory and communication. It however astonishes that until presently; some are still seen holding off on network protection. In my dialogue with one of the biggest entrepreneurs in Seattle, I noticed that this holding off is caused by a number of reasons, the main one being that network security often appear very complex in nature. This means that dealing with network security Seattle tends to be too much involving and demanding to some individuals and firms. The second reason is that there are those who have a preformed opinion that expending on network security will not bring about tangible growth to their businesses. For such individuals, it is advisable to regard network security more as a venture continuity aspect and not necessarily taking it as exclusively a technical issue. In the modern day business environment, networks are speedily becoming a fundamental part of venture operations, and this definitely makes security planning just as important as, or even more important than other business functions like sales and marketing. Third, many Seattle residents who own small and medium firms are of the belief that there is least likelihood of smaller firms being targeted by cyber criminals. On the contrary, since almost all the huge companies are putting a great deal of investment and focus on beefing up their network securities, hackers tend to be shifting towards small and medium sized ventures.
With that in mind, there are some tips that will be useful to anyone who has the intention of developing and winning support for an efficient and solid network security plan. To begin with, it is necessary to avoid focusing on return on investment but instead concentrate on the return on value aspect of the plan. In other words, take into consideration the damage that interference with network security may cause to the venture, including client litigation, stagnation and loss of revenue among many others. Second, one should avoid living with the assumption that network security breaches will only come from outsiders. There is a possibility of staff members, for example, unknowingly creating security susceptibilities. Moreover, fired, former, or disgruntled members of staff might as well bring about substantial damage. It is not a great decision to have temptations of confronting network security issues using a piecemeal strategy instead of one, integrated approach that offers total protection to the firm’s whole network.